Reviews
Anonymous
1) Around the same time as the previous poster, I used Susan Peter's service and experienced the exact opposite. At that time, I used the services of three other lawyers and Peter to offer the best service. And her rates were significantly lower than those of the other two lawyers.
2) Yes. Peter sometimes tells me something I don't want to hear. I wanted Peter to do more and I wanted him to solve the problem...But the invincible lawyer could only appear in the film, and had to be content with reality. We won in the end, but we should have earned more money. (Thank you Peter!) Nevertheless, Peter at the time offered low fees to customers who wanted to "become his lawyer," and he advertised himself in the local paper as one of the only local lawyers to do most or all of his legal work under her guidance.
3) If I really have a small amount of funding for my customers, as in those days, I can do my legal work (including research) and save them a lot of money. However, the former poster paid for Peter's work, so they seemed angry because they had to pay her for the work they had to do. 4) 2017...Nearly six years have passed since the old poster was posted. (Sounds like a false name) and notice three things. First, in the last six or so years, the poster has posted only one review. Second, since the poster uses a pseudonym and little detail is used, Peter probably could not have known how to respond or respond to the review. The third is the CA state bar web site. The bea s claim was presented in a study under state law. Although it may be shown at her post, Peter is still a lawyer at IN GOOD STANDING.
4) Peter also has an office in a convenient location in the city center. In addition to common sense, Petro, who has gained real experience in business law and landlord tenant law, has established offices in the same area for many years, so other people seem to know the same thing. Technically, I think she moved from her old office, but other expensive lawyers also moved. The difference is that she passes the savings to the customer.
In short, Peter charged me half the price that another inexperienced lawyer had charged me for work in the same area. Peter sometimes made me think using "socratic methods", but he is one of the most generous and fair lawyers I have ever met.
She has not done all the work on this case, but she has been able to understand it from the beginning. And sometimes I offered to increase the effort of the case, but one of my understandings was that because legal work is difficult and time-consuming, she had to pay that amount of money. I did many things myself, but I won my case and continued to appreciate Peter's help. It's not "bee". S" is true, Ruth!
Anonymous
I wish I could not choose a star, but recently the state and judicial hearing is ripe, smart, and not smart. She doesn't admit that she doesn't know the common problem of medical malpractice with lawyers. Even though she has only $xx, she will throw everything away and not help. When she fails to address the main reasons for seeking a lawyer and is not in contact and not able to answer, she gets angry, so there is money that she wants to believe, and money allocated to the retirement account of susan.
